Skip to content
ContentBeginner 5 min read

Editing an AI Draft: A Practical Checklist

A repeatable pass for turning a generated draft into something publishable — in the order that removes the most machine texture for the least effort.

A generated draft is a starting point that arrives looking finished, which is exactly what makes it dangerous — the temptation is to tidy rather than to edit. This is a checklist for the pass that actually changes the piece, ordered so the edits with the largest effect come first. It takes about twenty minutes on a thousand-word draft once you have done it a few times, and it is the difference between publishing something a reader stays with and publishing something they recognise.

What You'll Learn

  • Which edits remove the most machine texture for the least effort, and in what order
  • How to find the structural flatness that vocabulary changes cannot fix
  • Where to add the specifics that make a piece worth reading
  • How to check the factual claims a draft is most likely to have invented

Prerequisites

  • A generated draft of your own to work on
  • Whatever you normally write in, with version history turned on

Ready to follow along?

1

Step 1: Read it once without touching anything

Read the whole draft start to finish before making a single edit, and note only where your attention drifted. This feels like a waste of five minutes and it is the step that makes the rest efficient. Editing as you read fixes sentences and misses the shape, and the shape is the main problem with generated text. What you are looking for is the point where you stopped reading properly — that is almost always where the piece stopped saying anything, and it is usually much earlier than you would guess.

Pro Tip: Mark the drift points and nothing else on this pass. They are where the real cuts are, and they are invisible once you start fixing sentences.

2

Step 2: Fix the structure before the words

Read only the first sentence of every paragraph. If they are interchangeable in shape — each one setting up a point that the paragraph then elaborates and resolves — the piece has the flatness that no amount of word substitution addresses. Fix it by varying what paragraphs do: one makes a claim, one gives an example, one raises the objection, one is a single line that lands. Merge the pairs that make the same point and cut the ones that exist because the structure expected something there. This is the highest-leverage edit and most people skip straight past it to vocabulary.

Pro Tip: Check whether any two sections could swap places without the piece noticing. If they could, the argument has no sequence and that is worth fixing first.

3

Step 3: Make it commit to something

Search the draft for 'however', 'that said', 'it is important to note' and 'while it is true that'. Each one marks a place where a claim was made and immediately withdrawn. Delete most of them outright; where the qualification is real, make it specific — name the condition under which the claim fails rather than gesturing at the existence of exceptions. Then find the piece's actual argument and check it is stated somewhere in plain language. Generated drafts routinely cover a topic thoroughly without asserting anything, and a reader cannot tell what they were supposed to take away.

Pro Tip: Write the one sentence you want the reader to remember at the top of your notes. If you cannot find it in the draft, that is the edit.

4

Step 4: Add what only you know

This is the step that decides whether the piece is worth publishing. Add at least one thing that could not have been generated: a number you measured, something that went wrong, a specific case, an opinion you would defend. It does not need to be long — one concrete detail changes how the whole piece reads, because it demonstrates that someone with experience was involved. If you genuinely have nothing of this kind to add, that is a useful finding: the piece is a competent summary of things already published, and the honest question is whether it should exist rather than how to polish it.

Pro Tip: The best place for a specific is immediately after your strongest general claim. It converts an assertion into evidence.

5

Step 5: Cut the throat-clearing and the summaries

Delete the opening paragraph and read what is left; about half the time the piece is better and you have found the real opening. Do the same under each heading — the first sentence should answer the heading rather than reintroduce it. Then remove the summary sentence that closes each section restating what was just said, which generated drafts produce reliably and which readers skip. Beyond reading better, this is what makes passages quotable, and quotable passages are how a page gets used by an assistant answering someone's question.

Pro Tip: Aim to cut fifteen percent on this step. Generated drafts are almost always long in a way that carries no information.

6

Step 6: Check every fact the draft asserts

Generated text invents names, numbers, dates, citations and rules with total confidence, and the ones that survive into a published piece are the ones that sounded plausible. Go through and mark every specific claim, then check each against a real source rather than against another model. Pay particular attention to anything you did not supply — a figure the draft produced on its own is the highest-risk sentence in the piece. Where something cannot be verified, either attribute it, qualify it, or cut it, and cutting is usually right. [The wider verification routine](/blog/ai-fact-checking-hallucination-detection) is worth reading once if you publish regularly.

Pro Tip: Check the claims you liked most first. A figure that supports your argument neatly is the one you are least likely to question.

7

Step 7: Read it aloud, then stop

Read the finished piece out loud, or have it read to you. You will catch the sentence with too many clauses, the paragraph that says the same thing twice, and any remaining passage that sounds like a press release. Fix those and then stop — there is a point past which editing generated text becomes rewriting it, and if you have reached that point the honest conclusion is that the draft was not a useful starting point for this piece. Note it, and next time give the model a better brief rather than a longer editing session.

Pro Tip: If the read-aloud pass produces more than a handful of fixes, the problem was the brief. Improving that is cheaper than editing harder.

Wrapping Up

The order matters more than any individual step: structure first, then commitment, then the specifics only you have, then the cuts, then the facts, then the ear. Working in that order means the expensive edits happen on text you have already decided to keep. And the checklist has a second use — if a draft needs all seven steps applied heavily, the brief was wrong, and fixing that is faster than editing your way out of it every time.

Vincony's Proofreader and Paraphraser handle the mechanical half of this pass; the cutting and the specifics are the part worth your own attention.

Start building your personal AI setup today with Vincony's productivity tools.

← Previous Guide

AI for Nonprofits & NGOs